2026 Triumph Thruxton 400 and 2027 Tracker 400 Review – First Ride
A new era for entry-level motorcycles
The lightweight motorcycle class has quietly become one of the most interesting genres in the industry, and Triumph’s expanding 400cc lineup is playing a role in the space. What used to be a category defined mostly by compromise is now filled with bikes that feel modern, well-designed, and genuinely fun. The new Thruxton 400 and Tracker 400 push that idea even further, offering two distinct personalities built on the same platform, each aimed at a slightly different kind of rider but united by a shared philosophy: you don’t need overwhelming power to have a great riding experience.
2026 Triumph Thruxton 400
Carrying the Thruxton name, the new 400 exudes cafe racer styling while additions like Pirelli sticky buns and a front-forward riding position place Hinckley’s latest Single-cylinder machine at the pointy end of the sporting spectrum for its lightweights.
Highs
- Well-appointed cafe racer styling
- Sporty tires
- Commendable tech for the category
Sighs
- At high rpm, engine vibes come through
- Steering require more effort at the bars than the Tracker
- Limited steering sweep
2027 Triumph Tracker 400
The Tracker 400 brings flat-track styling to Triumph’s lightweight line-up. The upright riding position, fun Thumper engine, and overall character of the machine make it one of the most practical options of Hicnkley’s 400s.
Highs
- Comfortable rider triangle
- Wide steering sweep
- Commendable tech for the category
Sighs
- At high rpm, engine vibes come through
- Fork is a bit soft
- Limited wind protection
VIDEO: 2026 Triumph Thruxton 400 and 2027 Triumph Tracker 400 Review
The Thruxton and Tracker don’t give riders the false sense of skill with the robust size and insane electronics that your local squids rely on. Instead, it's about the fun you can have on a bike that isn’t bursting with power. That becomes clear almost immediately when riding in southern Spain, where the environment feels tailor-made for motorcycles, with constant elevation changes, tight corners, and smooth pavement that keeps you engaged turn after turn.
That setting matters, because these bikes shine brightest when the road starts to twist. With narrow, technical mountain sections mixed with urban traffic and faster connecting stretches, it becomes clear to understand what Triumph was aiming for with these latest 400s. These aren’t bikes built for spec sheet shootouts or bragging rights. They're built to an aesthetic while simultaneously being approachable for new riders who are looking to bring themselves into the fold.
One Engine, Two Distinct Experiences
On paper, the similarities between the Thruxton 400 and Tracker 400 are obvious. Both share Triumph’s updated 398cc liquid-cooled Single that we highlighted in our First Look, producing just over 41 horsepower and roughly 27.7 lb-ft of torque at the crankshaft, according to Triumph. The revisions to the engine — longer intake cam duration, higher valve lift, and updated mapping — give it a slightly more eager character, along with a higher rev ceiling of 10,200 rpm. Triumph also claims that 80 percent of torque is available from as low as 3,000 rpm, suggesting muscle across the rev range.
But numbers only tell part of the story. Out on the road, the engine reveals a more nuanced personality. It pulls cleanly through the low and midrange, and between 6,000 to 9,500 rpm is where it feels most alive — responsive, energetic, and genuinely fun. There’s a sweet spot there that encourages you to stay engaged with the gearbox and keep the engine spinning. Below that range, the response softens noticeably, and above it, the power doesn’t build much further.
At first, that can feel a bit counterintuitive. You expect more urgency as you rev it out, but instead, the bike gently nudges you toward a smoother, more deliberate riding style. It rewards momentum and clean inputs rather than aggression. Once that clicks, the experience becomes more cohesive. You stop chasing power and start focusing on rhythm. That rhythm feels different depending on which bike you’re riding.
Tracker vs. Thruxton: Feel on the Road
The Tracker 400 is the more intuitive of the two. From the moment you sit on it, everything feels natural. The upright riding position, wide handlebars, and slightly more relaxed geometry make it immediately approachable. There’s no learning curve, no adjustment period where you have to figure out how the bike wants to be ridden. I felt right at home.
The leverage from the bars and the neutral seating position make it easy to flick into corners, almost too eagerly at first. There’s an initial moment of surprise when the bike tips in quicker than expected, but once you settle into it, that responsiveness becomes addictive. It moves side to side with minimal effort and stays predictable even as the pace increases.
The slightly softer suspension setup contributes to that confidence. With more forgiving front-end behavior and a setup that absorbs imperfections well, the Tracker feels composed across a wide range of conditions. That should make it especially appealing for newer riders or anyone who just wants a bike that feels easy to enjoy.
Even the tires reinforce that versatility. The Pirelli MT60 RS, with its scrambler-inspired look, provides solid grip on pavement without ever feeling like a compromise. They suit the Tracker’s personality nicely: a bike that looks like it could go anywhere, even if it’s happiest on the road.
The Thruxton 400, by contrast, takes a different approach. Visually, it leans heavily into classic café racer styling, with a half fairing, low clip-on handlebars, and a more aggressive stance. It’s the kind of bike that immediately draws attention, looking far more premium than its $6,295 starting price would suggest. The proportions, the details, even the tire choice. Shod with Pirelli Diablo Rosso IVs, the Thruxton feels more serious, more performance-oriented.
That impression carries into the riding experience. The forward-leaning position changes how you interact with the bike. You’re more connected to the front end, forcing you to be more deliberate with your inputs. It doesn’t feel as instantly playful as the Tracker, but it offers a different kind of satisfaction.
Making a U-turn on the Thruxton requires more effort. It’s not reluctant, but it’s less eager to complete a 180. Fast sweeping turns require a bit extra countersteering compared to the Tracker but once leaned over, it feels stable and planted, holding a line with confidence. It rewards smoothness and precision rather than quick reactions. Where the Tracker encourages spontaneity, the Thruxton encourages intention.
The firmer suspension setup reinforces that character. It’s better suited for spirited riding on smooth roads, offering more feedback and control when the pace picks up. I am looking forward to testing this bike on track soon, where I believe it will shine — but you’ll have to wait a few weeks for that report.
Simple, Engaging, and Hard to Choose
Despite these differences, there’s a shared underlying character between the two bikes. The brakes, for example, are identical: a four-piston radial ByBre caliper up front with a single disc, and a simpler setup at the rear. They’re effective but not particularly sharp. Initial bite is there, but progression is limited. For most riders, especially those new to the segment, they’ll feel predictable and easy to manage. More experienced riders might wish for a bit more feedback and power, but it never becomes a serious limitation.
The same goes for electronics. Both bikes feature ride-by-wire throttle, ABS, and traction control, but the systems operate quietly in the background. They’re there when you need them, but they don’t define the experience. This isn’t about ride modes or fine-tuning settings, it’s about riding.
This simplicity extends to the rest of the bike. The analog-style dash with an LCD inset provides all the necessary information without overcomplicating things, which I love. Even though these bikes do not have a quickshifter, the switchgear is straightforward, the clutch is light thanks to the slip-and-assist design, and the gearbox is consistently smooth. Even small touches like a USB-C port add practicality without detracting from the overall aesthetic.
Of course, not everything is perfect. The engine felt a bit snatchy at low speeds, especially in first gear, requiring some clutch finesse in urban environments to smooth out driveline lash. Vibration also becomes noticeable as revs climb, particularly above 6,000 rpm, and intensify closer to redline — though you may not care if you’re pushing the pace on a Sunday afternoon. Where it could be offensive is during extended stints on freeways like we have in CA where 70 mph may put you in the same rpm. After spending some time in the high revs, my numbing hands and feet were telling me to shift sooner to quell the vibration. Despite having the same engine, the Tracker’s vibes were less noticeable than the Thruxton’s. While I wouldn’t consider this a deal-breaker for either machine, riders would be mindful to not wring its neck.
And in a way, that character is what makes these bikes stand out. They’re not trying to be flawless. They’re engaging, slightly imperfect machines that reward involvement. You have to work with them a bit, adapt to their quirks, and in return, they offer a more connected riding experience.
By the end of a full day on both bikes, the differences between them become less about specifications and more about feeling.
The Tracker is the one that makes the most sense to me. It’s comfortable, intuitive, and versatile. It’s the bike you can ride every day without drama, the one that builds confidence and encourages you to keep going just a little further. It makes better use of the platform in a practical sense, delivering an experience that feels cohesive and easy to enjoy. Plus, I love all the flat track-style details on it. The number plate proudly displaying part of its name and the dirt flying off of the word “Tracker” on the tank give this bike extra character.
The Thruxton, on the other hand, appeals on a more emotional level. It’s the one you look back at after parking. The small blue accents on the Storm gray colorway and the signature round LED headlight, integrated into a café racer front fairing, makes this bike feel special. The one that feels special before you even start the engine. Riding it is satisfying, but it’s the way it makes you feel, both on and off the bike, that sets it apart.
Both bikes capture something that’s often lost in higher-performance machines: the simple joy of riding. Without overwhelming power or intrusive technology, they put the focus back on the fundamentals — throttle control, cornering lines, and the flow of the road. In doing so, they remind you why motorcycles are fun in the first place.
This being my second time in Southern Spain, it has already become one of my favorite places to ride motorcycles. Days like this, with good roads, playful bikes, and fellow riders, are hard to beat, and the latest 400s from Triumph make it easy as a Sunday morning to enjoy.
Scorecard
2026 Triumph Thruxton 400
Engine | 18/20 | Suspension | 13/15 | Transmission | 9/10 |
Brakes | 7/10 | Instruments | 4/5 | Ergonomics | 8/10 |
Appearance | 10/10 | Desirability | 9/10 | Value | 10/10 |
Editors Score: 88.0% | |||||
2027 Triumph Tracker 400
Engine | 18/20 | Suspension | 12/15 | Transmission | 9/10 |
Brakes | 7/10 | Instruments | 4/5 | Ergonomics | 10/10 |
Appearance | 9/10 | Desirability | 10/10 | Value | 10/10 |
Editors Score: 89.0% | |||||
In Gear
- Helmet: Airoh Connor
- Jacket: REV'IT! London Ladies
- Airbag: Alpinestars Tech-Air 5 Plasma
- Gloves: REV'IT! Cassani H2O
- Jeans: REV'IT! Victoria 2 Ladies SF
- Shoes: REV'IT! Arrow 2 H2O Ladies
Specifications | 2026 Triumph Thruxton 400 | 2027 Triumph Tracker 400 |
|---|---|---|
MSRP | Starting at $6,295 | Starting at $5,995 |
Engine Type | Liquid-cooled, single-cylinder, 4 valve, DOHC | Liquid-cooled, single-cylinder, 4 valve, DOHC |
Capacity | 398 cc | 398 cc |
Bore | 89.0 mm | 89.0 mm |
Stroke | 64.0 mm | 64.0 mm |
Compression | 12:01 | 12:01 |
Maximum Power | 41.4 hp at 9,000 rpm (claimed) | 41.4 hp at 9,000 rpm (claimed) |
Maximum Torque | 27.7 lb-ft. at 7,500 rpm (claimed) | 27.7 lb-ft. at 7,500 rpm (claimed) |
Fuel System | Bosch electronic fuel injection with electronic throttle control | Bosch electronic fuel injection with electronic throttle control |
Exhaust | Stainless twin-skin header system with stainless steel silencer | Stainless twin-skin header system with stainless steel silencer |
Final Drive | X-ring chain | X-ring chain |
Clutch | Wet, multi-plate, slip & assist | Wet, multi-plate, slip & assist |
Gearbox | 6 speed | 6 speed |
Frame | Hybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe | Hybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe |
Swingarm | Twin-sided, cast aluminum alloy | Twin-sided, cast aluminum alloy |
Front Wheel | Cast aluminum alloy, 17 x 3.0 in | Cast aluminum alloy, 17 x 3.0 in |
Rear Wheel | Cast aluminum alloy, 17 x 4.0 in | Cast aluminum alloy, 17 x 4.0 in |
Front Tire | 110/70 R17 | 110/70 R17 |
Rear Tire | 150/60 R17 | 150/60 R17 |
Front Suspension | 43mm upside down Big Piston forks. 5.2 inches of wheel travel | 43mm upside down Big Piston forks. 5.5 inches of wheel travel |
Rear Suspension | Gas monoshock RSU with external reservoir and pre-load adjustment. 5.1 inches of wheel travel | Gas monoshock RSU with external reservoir and preload adjustment. 5.1 inches of wheel travel |
Front Brakes | Single 300mm fixed disc, four-piston radial caliper, ABS | Single 300mm fixed disc, four-piston radial caliper, ABS |
Rear Brakes | Single 230mm fixed disc, single piston floating caliper, ABS | Single 230mm fixed disc, single piston floating caliper, ABS |
Instruments | Analog speedometer with integrated multi-function LCD screen | Analog speedometer with integrated multi-function LCD screen |
Length | 80.4 inches | 80.1 inches |
Width (Handlebars) | 30.5 inches | 33.7 inches |
Height Without Mirrors | 43.7 inches | 41.3 inches |
Seat Height | 31.3 inches | 31.7 inches |
Wheelbase | 54.2 inches | 53.9 inches |
Rake/Trail | 24.5°/4.0 inches | 24.4°/4.2 inches |
Wet weight | 388.0 pounds | 381.4 pounds |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 3.43 gallons | 3.43 gallons |
Service Interval | 10,000 miles (16,000 km) / 12 months (whichever comes first) | 10,000 miles (16,000 km) / 12 months (whichever comes first) |
We are committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using the retail links in our product reviews. Learn more about how this works.
Become a Motorcycle.com insider. Get the latest motorcycle news first by subscribing to our newsletter here.
My motorcycle addiction began in 2013 after buying a 1986 Ninja 250 to save money on gas. We all know, motorcycles never truly save anyone money :). Most of my riding experience has been sport bikes on the street and the track. I recently started riding dirt bikes on trails and a little bit on MX. I am a certified MSF instructor, control rider for multiple track day organizations, and a current expert supermoto racer. I like to save money when I can so I do most of the maintenance on my motorcycles. Valve adjustments, engine rebuilds, and tire changes just to name a few.
More by Sylvia Houston
Comments
Join the conversation
Love this article! Triumph is #1🥇
So today, Friday April 24, I stopped in at my local Triumph dealer looking for the Tracker 400, just out of curiosity. Not interested in buying a 400cc single, as my current daily rider is a 1200cc Bonneville. I learned of the bike yesterday, on another rider website. The dealership had never heard of the bike. No idea at all. They did a google search and found it will go on sale this summer. Seems like not a whole lot of communication there.🤔